Sign up for MM  |  Manage Subscriptions  |  MM Archive

Pandora Turns Down $550 Million To Go Public

Pandora Turns Down $550 Million To Go Public

Recently Pandora filed their S-1, a document which a company files with the SEC as a prelude to selling stock to the public. This filing provides details about the company so that potential investors can make an informed decision about whether to buy shares in Pandora and at what price. There's much to like about Pandora - especially as a music fan, but one must remove emotions and examine the underlying economics to arrive at an accurate business assessment. Tremendous consumer adoption and revenue growth are ultimately overshadowed by the ominous cloud of music royalties looming over Pandora.

Pandora revealed some impressive usage numbers and corporate growth. Eighty million registered users have used the service to stream a whopping 3.9 billion hours of music. According to Pandora they claim to do 2% of all radio listening. Not surprising that their service is available on a wide range of devices and they're cultivating a relationship with car companies like Ford. Two hundred and forty five employees have worked to dramatically increase revenue to $90 million over the last 9 months. That's no small feat.

Apparently Pandora has impressed others because they turned down a suitor who offered hundreds of millions. Buried in the document they disclose that "Party A" made an offer to acquire Pandora for $3.14 per share which equates to about $550 million. The investors who have put more than $120,000,000 into the company believe they'll do better by going public. They're expecting to raise $100 million.

Now for the concerning part: music royalties. In the past, I explained how Pandora cannot be a profitable business due to high royalty rates. In their S-1 Pandora confirms this by stating, "CRB has consistently established royalty rates that would, if paid by us, consume an unsustainable percentage of our revenue." Pandora elaborates by stating that $45 million (half of their revenue) was spent on "content acquisition" which is how they describe music royalties. The vast majority goes to record labels but they also pay BMI 1.75% and SESAC 0.38% of gross revenue. They're currently fighting with ASCAP over how much to pay them.

And the outlook only gets worse. Pandora pays additional fees with each new user they add. That is compounded because rates go up 9% every year meaning their royalty bill will continue to swell even if they didn't add new users. Not explicitly mentioned is that Pandora is currently paying highly discounted rates that are 50% lower than what traditional radio stations who broadcast online must pay. That deal ends in 2015 and it's logical to presume that the introductory rates will not be extended and monies owed to record labels will double over night.

Even where there are glimmers of hope further investigation diminishes it. Pandora received $12 million in subscription revenue but that means less than 1 out of 100 people are willing to pay an annual or monthly fee. For those persons though they must pay 80% higher royalty rates so they actually generate less profit for these users then those who just see ads.

Possible expansion areas are discussed like international, talk and sports. However on the international front other countries have even higher royalties than the US. Talk and sports is a possible growth area, but for now people think of Pandora as a music source.

In 2009, Pandora's CEO proclaimed they were profitable and many news sites like TechCrunch, Mashable, Hypebot, and News.com trumpeted this. I was a lone voice to say that it simply wasn't true. Now we know from their own financial records that in fact they lost $32 million that year.

Leveraging their brand and growth numbers I expect Pandora to successfully raise $100 million. People really do like their service. But the unquenchable thirst for higher royalties of the music companies will continue to squeeze the life out of Pandora making it impossible for them to achieve any sizable profit without a radical shift in the business.

--MR
michael@michaelrobertson.com





The Michael's Minute Meter
 82%
 10%
 7%
 AGREE  DISAGREE  MIXED
  
Do YOU generally agree or disagree with Michael in this week's Minute shown above?
 
I generally AGREE with Michael this week
I generally DISAGREE with Michael this week
I am MIXED or don't have an opinion either way
 

View the Michael's Minute Meter Report


record radio; how to record Internet radio


How the Government Invisibly Tracks Smartphones
It's Not Just the NSA, Your Local Police Are Probably Spying On You Too
Why I'm Glad Net Neutrality Is Dead
My Dog Can Get A MRI In 2 Hours, Why Can't I?
Introducing The World's First Radio Search Engine
Is the MP3.com Domain Name Worth Millions?
Besides Tracking Your Every Move Online, The Government Is Tracking Where You Travel - We're All Under Investigation By The Government All The Time
Hey NBA Commish - Replace Boring Jump Ball With a Challenge Ball
Friendship is Magic
Crowd Sourcing Protection
ACTUAL Stats for radio business and they're very revealing!
Radio Hooks-up With Twitter And UberTalk Is Their Love Child
The Tax Wolf in Bond Clothing
Take a ride on the TaxBalloon.com
Radio Stations Are Dead - It's All About The Content - Introducing UberTalk
Download AM/FM Radio Shows To Smartphones & Tablets As MP3s Using DAR.fm
Zynga is a Ville-ain
MP3tunes Files For Bankruptcy Protection
YouTube Prevails (with a Little Help from MP3tunes & Veoh), But Get Do-over On Other Issues
Skydiving with the US Army
The MegaConspiracy is a MegaTravesty of Justice
Screwed FOREVER Artist List (Is Your Favorite Artist On It?)
Why Spotify can never be profitable: The secret demands of record labels
The Myth of the Underpaid Teacher
More Clouds of Music - Why Use MP3tunes?


blog comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2001 - 2011. All rights reserved.