Here is my list of college myths:
Myth: Colleges are poor.
Myth: Colleges aren't businesses.
Myth: You must go to college to
get otherwise secret info to
succeed in life.
Myth: Name brand
colleges justify higher prices.
Myth: Colleges care first and
foremost about students.
Read on for my explanations.
Colleges are poor.
Student education as an industry does comparable or better
than just about any other industry. They consistently take in much more
money than they spend (read: profit). They are adept at generating
revenue from many different sources: federal taxes, state taxes,
tuition, research, donations, etc. In the donation category alone $28
billion went into college endowments in 2006. 76 colleges now
endowments of $1
billion or more. The richest Universities rival the richest
Colleges (billions of dollars)
Companies (billions of dollars)
Colleges aren't businesses.
Colleges are driven by the exact forces as corporation.
Every college President I've spoken with talks about increasing
enrollment (marketing and sales), expanding the campus (capital
expenditures), and improving faculty (personnel). Some would claim that
the difference is that colleges do not garner a profit. Colleges do
garner profits, it's
just that they don't call it "profit", but that's just an issue of
semantics. They are generating more than they are spending. In
addition, there are many other affiliated entities (loan providers,
housing, book publishers, etc) which profit handsomely in and around
industry. College is big business with big profits for many. This isn't
to say that all colleges generate a profit, just as not all businesses
generate a profit. Higher education is simply another industry segment
in our free market economy and one that overall does well. The only
true difference between colleges and businesses is their preferential
tax treatment by the government.
must go to college to get otherwise secret info to succeed
Historically our planet has operated with a tiny number of people in
religious garb or the halls of academia having access to information.
400 years ago less than 5% of the world was literate. 200 years ago it
was around 20%. 50 years ago even if you could read you didn't have
access to written information cause it was sequestered in libraries
around the planet. These conditions led to the formation of large
centralized knowledge repositories and distributors (universities).
Today thanks to the Internet and high literacy rates, there's
virtually no secret information that isn't available with a few mouse
clicks. Knowledge is now a commodity
and cheaper than ever to acquire. Where once it may have been true
college attendance was required to gain knowledge today there
are many other options (trade schools, work experience, internships,
online courses). Some schools are now making class coursework available
for free online
with others like Yale
broadcasting the classroom instruction. (I think this is a great idea
and think all Universities - especially those accepting tax dollars
should be required to do this for the benefit of all citizens.)
For those who use money as a measure of success in life, take a look at
the Forbes 400 list of the richest Americans. On any
given year 10% or more of the people on the list never completed
college and some even dropped out of high school. The average wealth of
college graduates from the Forbes 400 is lower than the average wealth
of non-college graduates. There may have been a time when attending
college was the only access to information, but I believe that is no
longer the case.
brand colleges justify higher prices.
The underlying sentiment for college is that they have secret
information that you can only learn through attendance. Elite colleges
this sentiment to the extreme by suggesting that Ivy League or big
brand schools have even better information to provide that is worth
many times higher entry fee. Colleges are now brand cognizant and work
hard to influence
reporting, rankings, etc so they can demand top dollar of attendees. It
is little different than fashion brands trying to convince shoppers
that their lives will be better with that expensive Prada handbag or
watch. But college is many times the cost of a watch or purse and a
financial decision that can haunt you for years.
Often a better known college is recommended, and subsequently many
young people amass tens of thousands of dollars in debt instead of
going to a more economical school. This isn't to
say that there aren't differences between academic institutions, of
course there are, just as there are differences between restaurants.
But the notion that one school justifies 5, 10 or even 20 times the
cost of another is unsubstantiated.
Name brand colleges may in fact be better in some areas, but my
contention is that it does not justify substantially higher costs
because they're all teaching the same principles and often using the
same textbooks and coursework.
Colleges care first and foremost about students.
Colleges care first and foremost about their longevity. Their position,
their job, and their family livelihood are what drives their decisions
just as they do with all people.
This is not meant as a criticism, I know some great caring faculty
administrators. But except for the rare pious person, it's how we all
operate whether employed at a church, prison, corporation or college. I
think the biggest illustration of this is the great indifference that
colleges have towards mounting student debt. They get paid in full in
advance and leave the student to manage with with debt repayment often
at crippling expensive interest rates well into double digits.
Take one example - University of Michigan who's average student
graduates with $23,533
in debt plus another $4000 in credit card debt. (And remember
that's the average so many are higher.) Meanwhile their endowment fund
has $251,517 per student. To put this another way their spending habits
demonstrate they care more about building an ever-growing cash fund
than insuring that their students graduate with a realistic chance to
buy a house or start their own company out of college. I don't mean to
single out University of Michigan, I'm just using them as an example.
Annually colleges spend a miserly 4.6% of their endowment. They
historically have made more than 4.6% in interest and investment income
so endowments are not even spending their annual gains.
For sure college officials will say the right thing when questioned
about students financial well being. But ultimately it's actions which
matter most. If they truly cared about young people's finances they
would forgo the new buildings, athletic facility or research center and
make sure their students graduate without little to no debt. They would
spend those endowments to reduce college costs.
To discuss this topic with others, click here!
The Michael's Minute Meter
|Total Votes: 165|| |
View the Michael's Minute Meter Report